Wednesday, May 6, 2015

Welcome to the Sweet 16!

Can the Sweet 16 live up to the previous round, where several match ups went down to the wire, including two that switched in the final hour of voting? Check in here to find out!

I present our updated bracket:
...and clickable match ups:

Sweet 16:

Linus Pauling Regional:

Dorothy Crowfoot Hodgkin Regional:


Christian Anfinsen Regional:


Max Perutz Regional:



Contact arnoys_at_calvin_dot_edu if you want to cast a vote. Look also for a second chance poll for all of the proteins who lost in the last round.

Monday, May 4, 2015

clickable match ups for the second round


Now things are starting to get interesting! Who will advance to the next round? Cast your votes before 9 AM on Wednesday. You may still contact arnoys_at_calvin_dot_edu if you'd like to be added to the voting list.

Here are the clickable match ups:

Round 2:
Linus Pauling Regional:

CD4 vs. BMP-7

Dorothy Crowfoot Hodgkin Regional:


Christian Anfinsen Regional:


Max Perutz Regional:


Monday, April 27, 2015

clickable match ups for the first round

Elise Biesboer holds the ultimate prize following the triumph of sonic hedgehog in Protein of the Year 2014. Whose name will be added to the Jane Richardson Cup in 2015?

Voting begins soon. If you are interested in participating, please submit your request to arnoys_at_calvin_dot_edu.

The Quest for the Jane Richardson Cup

Linus Pauling Regional:

CD4 vs. hiFABP
YfiR vs. BMP-7

Dorothy Crowfoot Hodgkin Regional:


Christian Anfinsen Regional:


Max Perutz Regional:




the bracket is here!


Sunday, April 26, 2015

stories of the bracket

stories of the bracket

Jane Richardson was trained as a philosopher and a physicist but soon turned to studies of protein structures. She developed a means of representing α-helices and β-sheets in tertiary structures that is now the standard for protein structures, and she has continued her work as a pioneer in protein structure study and representation. She is now a member of the National Academy of Sciences, among other awards. In honor of her beautiful illustrations that have become the standard for understanding structure/function relationships, the prize for Protein of the Year is named “The Jane Richardson Cup.”

suggested links:

Linus Pauling won a Nobel Prize in Chemistry in part for predicting the structures of α-helices and β-sheets in proteins. He won a second Nobel Prize in Peace for his work on nuclear disarmament and the Partial Test Ban Treaty which limited above ground nuclear testing . He was close to a third prize for the structure of DNA, but Watson and Crick beat him to it.

suggested links:

Dorothy Crowfoot Hodgkin was a pioneer in x-ray crystallography, and many of the early protein crystallographers credit her work as a forerunner for theirs. She solved the first structures of vitamin B12 and insulin, among other things, and she won a Nobel Prize in Chemistry for this work in 1964.

suggested links:

Christian Anfinsen won a Nobel Prize for his elegant experiments demonstrating that the information necessary for ribonuclease folding was contained in its amino acid sequence. We know that this holds for other proteins, though sixty years later we still do a poor job of predicting a protein’s structure from its sequence.

suggested links:

Max Perutz is another giant in protein x-ray crystallography, having solved the initial structures of both oxy- and deoxyhemoglobin and proposing the Perutz mechanism by which hemoglobin switches between the R state and T state to bind and release oxygen. Along with John Kendrew, he received the Nobel Prize for his work in studying the structures of globular proteins.

suggested links:

Friday, April 24, 2015

Proteins in Red Shirts

What will the first round look like? For the first round our proteins will need opponents from outside of our class.


If you don't know the reference, check out What's in a name.

Thursday, February 5, 2015

Assignment 5: due Wednesday, April 15


Finish your blog. That's it. This assignment is worth the remaining 45 points.

Remember, your classmates will be using your blogs to determine which protein should be Protein of the Year 2015. Students will be asked to evaluate more on your posts than on the protein itself. How informative is your blog? How easy is it to read? How well have you incorporated images and any relevant reactions? How much effort have you put into it?

Once again, points will be fairly generous, but with the following caveats:

  • This is a firm deadline. If your blog is incomplete at this date, there will be deductions. If you do not have proper citations by this date (see below), you will receive a 0.
  • All figures must be properly cited to receive credit. If you made an image with PyMol or jmol, you must tell us the software you used and the PDB code. If you captured an image from the web or from printed material, you must provide a proper citation for it.
  • Cite where you found information as well, whether it be the primary literature, your textbook, wikipedia, etc. This is the reason you summarized journal articles for a previous assignment.
  • The work must be your own.
  • Typos should be cleaned up as best you can, especially if someone has pointed this out in a suggestion.
  • The bracket will be announced shortly thereafter.